Comparison | Browser Harness
Playwright MCP vs Browser Harness.
Same score on 100 public browser tasks, using half the median input tokens per task. And Browser Harness works in your real Chrome, logged in as you.
Side by side
Pick Playwright MCP for a clean, isolated browser in tests, or if your team already runs Playwright.
Questions
Is Browser Harness better than Playwright MCP?
On success, they tie. On 100 public BU Bench V2.1 tasks with the same agent (Codex, GPT-6 Luna), the same cloud browser and the same judge, Browser Harness scored 60.4 and Playwright MCP 60.0 out of 100, inside each other's confidence intervals. The difference is cost: Playwright MCP used 2.1x the input tokens per task (median 4.4M vs 2.1M), so the agent's bill was $0.066 vs $0.042 per task. One run per task; per-task scores are public.
Can I use both?
Yes, they do not conflict. Use Playwright MCP for isolated test runs and Browser Harness for work on sites you are logged in to.
Does Browser Harness have an MCP server?
Yes, browser-harness-mcp, for any MCP client. You usually do not need it: the setup prompt installs Browser Harness as a skill, with no config to edit.
What does it cost?
Nothing. Browser Harness is open source under MIT, and using your own Chrome is free. Cloud browsers are $0.02 per browser-hour if you want them.
You will never use
the browser again.